Born in the cradle of civilization, Athens, Greece, Ange Postecoglou’s journey through the football cosmos is a tale as diverse as it is compelling. A voyage that eventually led him to the sunburned shores of Australia, where he carved his path through the Australian football landscape. But Ange was destined for grander stages, and soon he set his sights on the rugged terrain of Scotland.
In the land of kilts and bagpipes, he took the helm of Celtic Football Club and left an indelible mark. His tactical prowess, a blend of Greek philosophy and Australian grit, allows us to delve deeper into the mind of this tactical virtuoso, dissecting the complexities of his approach, and unlocking the secrets behind his strategic alchemy.
In Postecoglou’s tactical framework of the 2-1-2 build-up, we observe a distinctive positioning strategy. The center-backs are strategically positioned on either side of the goalkeeper. The pivotal defensive midfielder, often referred to as the “6,” takes a station just outside the penalty area. Meanwhile, the right and left fullbacks assume a unique role by tucking into the midfield, effectively serving as auxiliary midfielders.
The central midfield dynamic unfolds with the two number 8s, who find themselves stationed on the wings. However, what truly piques our interest is the intricate movements of these 8s. One of them embraces the responsibility of holding width on one wing, while the other takes on the role of a roaming 8. This dynamic midfielder is known to be a chameleon, oscillating between positions on the wings, in the center, or within the half-space, forming fluid triangles with teammates across the pitch.
This versatility is exemplified by a player of James Maddison’s caliber, as he orchestrates actions across the entirety of the pitch, creating opportunities for his team through his adaptability and strategic positioning. In this tactical setup, the winger’s primary role is to maintain a wide position along the touchline, effectively stretching the opponent’s defensive shape and expanding the playing field. The underlying objective of this system’s structure and player movement is to generate space and passing options
It’s noteworthy to highlight Postecoglou’s preference for a touchline-hugging style of play, which diverges from the natural inclinations of Tottenham’s wingers, Heung-min Son and Dejan Kulusevski. Both of these players tend to cut inside and seek goal-scoring opportunities. To leverage the unique qualities of these individuals while preserving the tactical structure’s rigidity, Postecoglou incorporates a tactic where a designated player overlaps when Kulusevski drifts inward. This overlapping player can then deliver a cross or cut the ball back into the box.
Additionally, Spurs exploit the opposition’s marking strategy to their advantage. If opponents use man-marking to track the full-backs, who often operate as auxiliary midfielders, it creates opportunities for the team. For instance, when an opposition winger moves inside to mark a player like Pedro Porro (functioning as an auxiliary midfielder), Pape Matar Sarr shifts into the space vacated by the opposing winger on the far right to receive the ball.
This situation presents a dilemma for the opposition midfielder; should he opt to follow Sarr down the far right, he risks leaving space open for the roaming Maddison and the forward, Richarlison, who drops into midfield to cause havoc. However, if he chooses to address the potential threats posed by Maddison and Richarlison and leaves Sarr unmarked, Kulusevski can drop back to Sarr to receive a pass, enabling him to drive forward, deliver a cross, or execute a precise ball cutback for late-arriving teammates.
In the event that a defender decides to track Kulusevski when he drops, the space vacated by that defender becomes an opportunity for either Sarr or Oliver Skipp to exploit, allowing them to cut the ball back effectively. On the opposite flank, Son maintains width and makes penetrating runs into the box to capitalize on goal-scoring opportunities.
Spurs’ attacking strategy often involves overloading one side of the pitch before switching play to the other. When attacking through the left flank, Son provides width while the left-back, also functioning as an auxiliary midfielder, moves into the halfspace. From there, the left-back can either make a forward run and cut the ball back, or Son can decide to make an inside run himself, providing multiple attacking options.
Overall, this tactical approach aims to maximize the strengths of individual players within a structured system, exploiting opposition marking schemes and creating dynamic attacking opportunities. Deploying a tactical setup with two center-backs and two inverted full-backs introduces intriguing passing options through the central channel, injecting dynamism into Spurs’ attacking arsenal. Yet, this strategic choice carries its share of defensive vulnerabilities.
When the team lacks possession, the rest defence structure shifts into a 2-1 configuration, with the center-backs and an additional player forming the spine, leaving exposed wide and deep spaces. Exploring the mechanics of this 2-1 rest defense structure reveals its reliance on these three pivotal players for defensive stability.
The center-backs must adeptly patrol the central areas, while the supplementary player acts as a shield, disrupting passing lanes and applying pressure when necessary. The remaining three players in the midfield and forward lines are tasked with diligently tracking back and providing support to regain possession.
This configuration boasts several advantages. Firstly, it establishes numerical superiority in central zones, impeding opponents’ progress through the middle. Secondly, it encourages swift ball recovery due to committed players intent on regaining possession. Lastly, it facilitates a seamless transition from defense to attack, promoting quick and precise passing combinations.
However, the 2-1-3 rest defense structure isn’t without its flaws. The vast spaces left behind the center-backs can be ruthlessly exploited by adept counter-attacking teams. Opponents can target the wings and deep channels, launching rapid counterattacks that catch the defensive line unprepared. To mitigate this risk effectively, meticulous positioning, rapid reactions, and coordinated pressing are imperative.
In summary, while the 2-1-3 rest defense structure enhances a team’s dominance in central areas and facilitates swift transitions, it necessitates a calculated trade-off. The exposed flanks and deep zones become inviting avenues for counterattacking opponents. It’s a tactical choice that demands a delicate balance between attacking prowess and defensive stability, often requiring astute management to minimize its inherent vulnerabilities.
This trade-off is deemed worthwhile because attempting to increase the number of players involved in rest defense can stifle the attack, as exemplified by Thomas Tuchel’s managerial journey. During his tenure at Borussia Dortmund, Tuchel’s side played exhilarating and breathtaking football but conceded a plethora of opportunities for opponents to exploit on the counter. Tuchel’s adjustment, involving five players in rest defense when without the ball, led to fewer counterattacking opportunities conceded, but it also transformed his teams into more pragmatic and less all-out attacking units, as seen in his Chelsea and Bayern Munich teams.
The destiny of Tottenham Hotspur remains shrouded in uncertainty. As we look ahead, the path they tread may be long and arduous, fraught with challenges that could either forge greatness or spell their downfall. Yet, amid this tumultuous journey, one undeniable truth emerges – Tottenham Hotspur has etched its name in the hearts of football enthusiasts worldwide.
This club, with its rich history and passionate fanbase, has a remarkable ability to captivate, inspire, and evoke emotion. They’ve left indelible marks on the beautiful game’s canvas, and with each stride they take, they continue to craft their unique narrative. In the grand theater of football, Spurs are both the protagonists and antagonists, drawing admiration from their supporters and invoking the ire of their rivals.
But let us not forget the neutral spectators, those who find themselves enchanted by the magic of Tottenham’s play. This is a team that, in moments of brilliance, can leave even the most impartial observers in awe. They are the architects of dreams and the purveyors of drama, making the beautiful game all the more beautiful.
We cannot predict the twists and turns that lie ahead for Tottenham Hotspur. Yet, we can be certain of one thing – their journey will continue to excite, amaze, and inspire. Spurs may be enigmatic, but they are also a testament to the enduring allure of football. So, let us watch with bated breath, for the saga of Tottenham Hotspur is far from over, and the next chapter promises to be as captivating as any that came before.
By Tobi Peter / @keepIT_tactical
Featured Image: @GabFoligno / Steve Welsh – PA Images